The UNHCR received $1.9 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds in 2024 and $2.1 billion in 2023.
By Todd Bensman as published October 30, 2024 by The Daily Wire
TAPACHULA, Mexico — A 75,000-square feet mega-mall, built to enable industrial-scale illegal immigration to the U.S. southern border, is almost online here in this key entry city just across from Guatemala.
But its scheduled December opening projects a statement that not many Americans may ever readily hear — that powerful global agencies that will run the mass migration operation inside, the United Nations key among them, are very much bullish on a long-term future of continued heavy U.S.-bound illegal immigrant traffic through Mexico. No matter the outcome of the November 5 American presidential election.
Those bullish investors are the dozens of migration-oriented UN agencies and private international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have already plowed hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. tax money into constructing a permanent, incentivizing safety net of aid way stations for migrants. Way stations that stretch for thousands of miles along the migration routes from South America to the U.S. border, all built over the last nearly four years of President Joe Biden’s administration.
The record hundreds of millions of dollars in aid is distributed at the way station network in the form of cash cards; cash in envelopes, food, vouchers for onward travel and lodging, medical treatment, pharmaceuticals, legal counseling and much more. (For more, see: UN Budgets Millions for U.S.-Bound Migrants in 2024). This aid has without doubt helped the UN and its growing constellation of NGOs keep the masses moving north through Tapachula in record numbers toward irresistible Biden border policies that have welcomed arrivals in their historic millions. (See: Biden Admin. Sends Millions to Religious Nonprofits Facilitating Mass Illegal Migration)
The UN and NGOs are betting on a busy future in Mexico. Going forward, the purpose of this one strategically located facility is to “respond comprehensively to the needs of people who arrive in Mexico…migrant refugees who travel together from all continents, and arrive in Tapachula in need of a response or attention,” Giovanni Lepri, the Mexico representative for the United Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR), told reporters when Mexico’s foreign ministry announced it in April 2024.
But the Tapachula mall represents a far more expansive billion-dollar migration-route safety net constructed during the Biden-Harris years using record-breaking U.S. taxpayer contributions. It plugs into two other huge, one-stop-migration malls erected in the northern Mexico cities of Monterrey and Tijuana. These gleaming new Mexican facilities and plenty of UN and NGO substations in Mexican towns and cities merely form the final terminus of the trails to the United States lined with pots of U.S. tax money gold all along the way. But they are representative of what’s happening throughout Latin America.
The UNHCR, which received $1.9 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds in 2024 and $2.1 billion in 2023 (compared to $377 million in 2019) for migration assistance throughout Latin America, started building the Tapachula facility on land donated by Chiapas State as part of the deal with Mexico to run it. The UNHCR, UN International Organization for Migration (IOM), UNICEF, and dozens of private often religion-based NGOs scattered around Tapachula, will work alongside one another under one massive roof here – evidently planning a years-long collaboration.
None of the UN/NGO pots of gold are exactly secret but are relatively hard to find for the uninitiated. Even harder to grasp is any connection to domestic American policies or legitimate points of political debate.
The UN’s 2024 update to the “Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan” (RMRP for short), a UNHCR and IOM planning and budget document, lays out in detail how it planned to hand out nearly $1.6 billion in 17 Latin America countries using its network of 248 different NGOs. (For the complete list of involved groups, see p. 268, here, and explore their activities further with this interactive tool).
That was on top of the 2023-2024 RMRP plan, which called for 228 NGOs to spend $1.72 billion on trailside assistance to thousands of migrants who they all know will illegally pass through many countries and, finally, breach the U.S. border.
Hundreds of millions of dollars for all of this comes straight from U.S. taxpayers in the form of sharply increased U.S. State Department bequeathals, USAID grants, and flexible spending contributions to the UNHCR and IOM.
Too Far For Average Americans To See
For an idea of how U.S. tax money is spent to flood the American border, the far northwest Colombian town of Necoclí provides a window. This is a major staging town for migrants preparing to boat across the Gulf of Urabá for smuggler-guided backpack trips through the so-called “Darien Gap” jungle passage that leads into Panama and eventually Mexico.
In Necoclí, the UN and NGO agencies arrayed themselves in something like an outdoor swap meet of NGO booths and an IOM mobile bus office on a few acres next to the gulf beach, the Center for Immigration Studies observed during an August 2024 research trip to the region. The Jewish NGO Cadena was set up in a booth next to the Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA).
NGO and UN workers there said they provide a variety of trail advice and plenty of supplies to the immigrants, including socks, underwear, backpacks, bug repellant, water filters, sunscreen, and Vaseline. In addition, they offer survival advice, like classes for children on how to avoid sexual predators among the strange men traveling the Darien Gap.
And food.
“Like things easy to carry so they can eat and be done with it,” the Cadena worker said.
On this day, the Cadena worker said she’d given out thousands of food items such as packaged soup to more than 3,000 migrants during the previous few months, showing the last of it: a box with a handful of granola bars she hoped to hand out soon so she could go home.
What about critics who say NGOs like Cadena are helping migrants break the laws of many countries?
“As an organization,” the Cadena worker responded. “We’re not here to judge. We’re just here to provide a service.”
But aren’t you helping them migrate?
“Only by giving them the things that I mentioned, not money or fare, just certain resources for the trip,” she explained.
iPad-carrying UNHCR workers interacted with groups of migrants sitting in chairs under open-air shelters, surveying their needs for the trail ahead.
Across the Urabá Gulf in the staging town of Acandi, the Clan del Gulfo paramilitary controls the human smuggling operations into the Darien Gap. The cartel runs two migrant camps where the migrants are brought for final journey preparations.
We gained permission to access one of the camps, “Camp 1.” Inside, we found NGOs providing medical services, legal counseling, and food.
Furthermore, Colombian banks had been allowed to set up a money wiring service so that migrants could pay their foot guides.
All involved could not possibly be unaware that the people they are assisting intend to break the immigration laws of a half dozen countries up trail, including, ultimately, illegally breaching the American border.
The IOM workers hand out hygiene kits to women but had run out of the kits some days earlier.
The Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA) teaches then how to filter jungle water and avoid sleeping in flood-prone riverbanks.
A Bright Future For Mass Migration?
The UN and NGO’s migration advocacy industrial complex is now preparing its 2025-2026 plan for the trails of Latin America.
A request for input from its NGO partners suggests an ambitious coming year for providing “cash and voucher assistance,” “food security,” “humanitarian transportation,” “shelter,” and most other basic human needs.
Who will be the recipients?
“Refugees and migrants in-transit (all nationalities) who cross an international border.”
Most of which would be much less possible without the generous support of the American taxpayer.
Leave a Reply